When HN users recommended it
1 HN user recommended this in 2017, in one comment.
20072026
Each tall tick is one HN user's first recommendation. A short tick is the same user again. Click a tick to jump to the comment.
1 HN user recommended this in 2017, in one comment.
Each tall tick is one HN user's first recommendation. A short tick is the same user again. Click a tick to jump to the comment.
I don't think any of the good watch manufacturers can claim "leading the game in engineering and quality" in the sense that it's way better. Maybe Rolex is statistically 10% better quality (measured how? durability? fit and finish? design?) than the classic "beater" automatic Seiko SKX007 ($200, https://www.amazon.com/dp/B000B5MI3Q ), but then the price of the Rolex Sub is >40x higher.
If you're really after extreme durability (which is one aspect of quality), I think you'd be very hard pressed to find an automatic better than the Marathon GSAR, which is about 1/10th the price of a Rolex Sub.
https://www.marathonwatch.com