When HN users recommended it
1 HN user recommended this in 2019, in one comment.
20072026
Each tall tick is one HN user's first recommendation. A short tick is the same user again. Click a tick to jump to the comment.
1 HN user recommended this in 2019, in one comment.
Each tall tick is one HN user's first recommendation. A short tick is the same user again. Click a tick to jump to the comment.
That would be great to get as a measurement and filter by. It still won't solve the problem you want it to.
This is a product with 1 measurement, maybe 1.5 if you count length. Due to flare, waist position, ratio to waist, etc. the length is subjective even with an absolute value assigned. Providing those measurements in this one case will help, but then you have to deal with "skirts" as a whole category with many sub-categories. And your measurements need to apply universally, so you need style, waist, waist position, length, flare, hobble and more. Broad categories for any of them won't help you, so "> 150cm" is not going to help beyond an existing "plus size" filter. Where the skirt sits matters too, so 150cm is fine for https://amazon.com/dp/B01G0YFAWM/ but not for https://amazon.com/dp/B07HB2NXPY/ .
https://amazon.com/dp/B01KXBI2VE/#g2s2SizeChartView_15496401... shows they have the data in some cases. There's a proper HTML chart with all the measurements as "Size Chart" in the pictures section. I would love infinite knobs to filter on every aspect, but most people (as proved per $ spent) prefer fewer simpler options for how to find products.